Meeting of the two greatest psychology masters the world has ever seen. As we know, these two are good friends at first. shares his researches and thoughts; With long letters and long conversations, they both count and love each other and exchange ideas about the science they have devoted their lives to. But when [Jung](/q?l=en&q=jung) says, "This sexuality is good, it's a very important thing, as if I have other things to work with," the bond between them begins to crack. [Freud tells](/q?l=en&q=freud) [Jung](/q?l=en&q=jung) not to give up on the subject of sexuality, but to keep it going, but although [Jung](/q?l=en&q=jung) acknowledges the importance and power of sexuality, he does not consider sexuality as the most important field in his work and shifts his research to other directions. this breaks the gap between the two and the conflict begins. (I read this story from [jung](/q?l=en&q=jung) 's [mouth.I'm](/q?l=en&q=jung) his liar :) <br> [Freud](/q?l=en&q=freud) 's contribution to the world of psychology is undeniable. he is a great thinker and scientist. I can really observe many things he says in everyday life. It is certain that he laid the foundations of the matter with an incredible insight. But - again as [Jung](/q?l=en&q=jung) said - he was too obsessed with sexuality and tried to explain most things with him, accepting the most important point as sexuality. Of course, it cannot be said that [freud](/q?l=en&q=freud) is only interested in sexuality. (I guess there are no more claiming this now). However, it can be said that he is a little too obsessed with this issue. [Jung said](/q?l=en&q=jung) something about himself, like " [Freud](/q?l=en&q=freud) never explained to himself why he was so [obsessed with](/q?l=en&q=freud) sexuality." (Regarding this issue, my psychology teacher said, "Freud's words also apply to freud.") I think one of the points where he was criticized was that he mostly worked with one type of patients. <br> [Jung](/q?l=en&q=jung) traveled, wandered, lived with the natives, devoured mythology, religion, alchemy, studied fairy tales, dreams, fantasies, and established the [psychology](/q?l=en&q=analitik+psikoloji) we call [analytical psychology](/q?l=en&q=analitik+psikoloji) today. [jung](/q?l=en&q=jung) psychology is very broad and comprehensive. He talks about the [archetypes](/q?l=en&q=arketip) and stages of the individuation process on the way to reach the self. While describing the way of being a whole person, it deals with the human being as a whole. tell the unity of opposites. it reveals how all humanity has seen the same symbols for centuries with the [collective unconscious](/q?l=en&q=kolektif+bilin%c3%a7d%c4%b1%c5%9f%c4%b1) . In this sense, this holistic view and his work with many different individuals from many different cultures, unlike Freud, impressed me. <br><br> It always [seemed to](/q?l=en&q=freud) me that while [Freud was](/q?l=en&q=freud) caught on one side of the event, [Jung was](/q?l=en&q=jung) looking at the whole. <br><br> Note 2: [Jung](/q?l=en&q=jung) is in a special place inside me, so I can be biased. <br><br> note 3: [i](/q?l=en&q=freud) did not read [freud](/q?l=en&q=freud) as much as i did [jung](/q?l=en&q=jung) . I might be wrong. <br><br> (see: [sigmund freud](/q?l=en&q=sigmund+freud) ) <br> (see [carl gustav jung](/q?l=en&q=carl+gustav+jung) )